Carlotta Balestra is a Policy Analyst at the OECD working on advancing how societies define and improve well-being. She has contributed to the work behind the OECD Better Life Initiative — including the Better Life Index and the report How’s Life? Measuring Well-Being — and she currently coordinates a number of analytical and statistical projects on the measurement of well-being inequalities. In 2015, she conceptualised and contributed to the development of the OECD Compare Your Income web-tool, which allows to assess people’s perceptions of income inequality. Carlotta has published in peer-reviewed academic journals and contributed chapters in collected volumes, such as the Handbook of Research on Economic and Social Well-being.
Congratulations. This is a superb tool and an example of top class communication. Every politician in an OECD country should look at this - and the Better Life Index - regularly. As Tomas Pikkety has shown, income distribution developments are a clear and present danger to capitalist and mixed societies. Some remarks:
- Elements of the cute design regularly cover text or figures. You may want to test the site on a Mac with Safari.
- I am interested in the stats for more than the top three social spending categories chosen to enhance with extra tax receipts. BTW, since money is fungible, new tax receipts do not necessarily have to be spent on social goals to achieve income re-distribution. How about e.g. lowering sales tax, which would have a net income equalising effect?
- I understand OECD can go only so far with its conclusions. Why not make the code publicly available for those who want to go further (like e.g. Wikipedia)?
Thank you very much for your positive feedback, Peter! Compare your income (CYI), along with the Better Life Index, is part of a broad OECD endeavour to make our statistics as accessible as possible to a larger audience all while preserving their robustness.
Before its launch, we tested CYI on different systems (iOS, Android) and many display sizes to ensure that it worked properly under different configurations. We were not able to test all configurations, so we apologise for the inconvenience you experienced. We will inform our web-developer so they may explore this issue further.
I agree with you that redistribution through income tax and social transfers is only one possible way to keep inequality in check. Future editions of the web-tool could indeed dig further into people's views on who bears responsibility for reducing income differences and on which instruments should be used.
Once sufficient data has been collected, our objective is to prepare analysis on people’s preferences and priorities to help policymakers as they develop their recovery strategies. We also plan to make anonymised users’ responses available to the research community.
We and selected partners, use cookies or similar technologies as specified in the cookie policy and privacy policy.
You can consent to the use of such technologies by closing this notice.
Cookie Control
Customise your preferences for any tracking technology
The following allows you to customize your consent preferences for any tracking technology used
to help us achieve the features and activities described below. To learn more about how these trackers help us
and how they work, refer to the cookie policy. You may review and change your preferences at any time.
These trackers are used for activities that are strictly necessary to operate or deliver the service you requested from us and, therefore, do not require you to consent.
These trackers help us to provide a personalized user experience by improving the quality of your preference management options, and by enabling the interaction with external networks and platforms.
The Forum Network is an online space to discuss the big issues of the OECD annual Forum: Digitalisation, a New Societal Contract, International Co-operation and Trust. Shape ideas. Shape policy. Shape the Future.
Recent Comments
Congratulations. This is a superb tool and an example of top class communication. Every politician in an OECD country should look at this - and the Better Life Index - regularly. As Tomas Pikkety has shown, income distribution developments are a clear and present danger to capitalist and mixed societies. Some remarks:
- Elements of the cute design regularly cover text or figures. You may want to test the site on a Mac with Safari.
- I am interested in the stats for more than the top three social spending categories chosen to enhance with extra tax receipts. BTW, since money is fungible, new tax receipts do not necessarily have to be spent on social goals to achieve income re-distribution. How about e.g. lowering sales tax, which would have a net income equalising effect?
- I understand OECD can go only so far with its conclusions. Why not make the code publicly available for those who want to go further (like e.g. Wikipedia)?
Thank you very much for your positive feedback, Peter! Compare your income (CYI), along with the Better Life Index, is part of a broad OECD endeavour to make our statistics as accessible as possible to a larger audience all while preserving their robustness.
Before its launch, we tested CYI on different systems (iOS, Android) and many display sizes to ensure that it worked properly under different configurations. We were not able to test all configurations, so we apologise for the inconvenience you experienced. We will inform our web-developer so they may explore this issue further.
I agree with you that redistribution through income tax and social transfers is only one possible way to keep inequality in check. Future editions of the web-tool could indeed dig further into people's views on who bears responsibility for reducing income differences and on which instruments should be used.
Once sufficient data has been collected, our objective is to prepare analysis on people’s preferences and priorities to help policymakers as they develop their recovery strategies. We also plan to make anonymised users’ responses available to the research community.