Slowing Down: Better Policies for Better Lives

Banner image: Will Duncan
Slowing Down: Better Policies for Better Lives

This article is part of a series in which OECD experts and thought leaders – from around the world and all parts of society – address the COVID-19 crisis, discussing and developing solutions now and for the future. It aims to foster the fruitful exchange of expertise and perspectives across fields to help us rise to this critical challenge. Opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the OECD.

To keep updated on all of the OECD's work supporting the fight against COVID-19, visit our Digital Content Hub.

The human world is slowing down and has been for some time. It has been slowing in many ways, and this can be seen most easily in OECD (mostly richer) countries. The slowdown includes not only demographics, as we have fewer and fewer children, but also economics as rates of growth each decade are now slower than in the decades before, especially in countries where they were highest in the 1950s and 1960s.

We have a tendency to ignore long-term trends and to fixate on short-term events. Short-term events transfix us; but a post- (or low-) COVID-19 world will be a world where the future is just as determined by the long-term slowdown already underway. In this way, this coronavirus differs from previous rapid infection pandemics such as those of influenza in 1918, 1951, 1957 and 1968/69. All of those previous, sudden pandemics happened in the era of acceleration. This is different. I have drawn hundreds of charts to show that when it comes to demography, innovation, social trends and economics, the period from the 1820s up to 1968 was one in which there was not just more each year – the rate of growth itself was often accelerating. Animations of just of these charts can be found here. The charts can initially be difficult to understand, but for people who have just lived through a pandemic, concepts of acceleration and deceleration are more at the forefront of our minds. So if you want to understand those other slowdown charts first consider this one:

The chart above shows the rise and then fall in the number of reported deaths in China, the USA and five European countries due to COVID-19. At first, the lines rose from the origin (0,0), all to the right, as not only do the number of deaths rise each day, but so too does the rate of that increase (each and every day at first). During the middle of February 2020, the pandemic began to be brought under control in China, so the trendline then shifts to the left of the vertical axis signifying falls after the initial slowdown. Germany, too, appears to have falling numbers just a few weeks later than China. The data is smoothed to take out the effect of fewer deaths being reported at weekends, but also because trends are always easier to see this way. The “looping down” in China also happened elsewhere, but later. Slowdown is often not smooth.

The next chart below shows what happened next. The numbers of deaths rose unexpectedly in Germany between 4 and 8 April; but that was dwarfed by what appeared to be uncontrollable acceleration in the rest of Europe and the United States. Lockdowns were imposed just before most of these rises. At this time, the trend in France seemed to be the worst in Europe because it was able to include counts of the numbers who were dying in care homes. It turned out later not to be the worst; you can often only see the full picture in retrospect.

Slowdown is completely different from acceleration. It is the time when the phenomena is still rising, but the rise appears to be coming under some kind of control. Just as this happens in all pandemics, it also happens in almost every other aspect of our lives – but usually over a matter of years or decades, not just weeks. That is why we find the larger slowdowns in our lives, or the slowing pace of change, much harder to appreciate and accept than the abating of a pandemic. We are impatient, almost always absorbed by what is happening right here and right now. Never more so than when there is something very new to grab our attention.

Innovation in Adversity: How the Coronavirus Crisis Could Help Rediscover Society, and Ourselves by Alan Lightman, Writer; Physicist, MIT

Innovation in Adversity: How the Coronavirus Crisis Could Help Rediscover Society, and Ourselves by Alan Lightman, Writer; Physicist, MIT

The penultimate graph below shows how the pandemic began to end in Europe while it was still rising in the United States. Shown again are the seven states of the world which, at this time, recorded the most deaths worldwide. These were places the pandemic came to first, and most quickly, and which also had very many elderly people and very crowded cities. Data for England and Wales is also included on this graph because, by then, care-home deaths were being included but only for those two countries within the UK.

For many months, possibly years, we will be talking about how different nations within the OECD dealt differently with the emergency. But these charts help illustrate just how similar the shape of the trends were in all European countries. Soon, all the European lines will be back very near to the 0,0 origin of the graph, where China is already; and where later in summer of autumn the USA will hopefully be.

Now that you know what a slowdown looks like when drawn out, you can look at many other trends in this way. I have only found four trends prior to 2020 that were not only rising but also accelerating annually: air passengers worldwide, global carbon emissions, planetary temperature, and the number of university graduates. High resolution open access images of these four and over 60 others can be found here and hundreds of others can been seen within the 67 spreadsheets made available here

In the short term, you may be worrying about flights and wondering when it might be possible to fly again; but the numbers had to stop accelerating, and this would have occurred at some point regardless of the pandemic. So, too, carbon emissions would have at some point decelerated; the next temperature increase would not rise as fast; and we would also educate more graduates locally, with less acceleration in that as well. There is an absolute limit to the proportion of young people in the world who will go to university, when one day we treat going to university as we do going to secondary school today; however long before that day, the annual rise in graduates will have slowed.

The pandemic has caused huge suffering. But it will also have widened our imaginative horizons. What you thought was not possible just a few months ago clearly is. And the world does not end just because so many of us now consume less, pollute less and worry more about what really matters most – others’ and our own health.

Also on the Forum Network:

"Now is time for a strong, sustainable and inclusive recovery" 

by Dimitri Zenghelis and Nick Stern

This pandemic, terrible as it is, will not dent the trend in rising global life expectancy that has been rising since 2010, but at a slower pace. It will alter our patterns and volumes of trade, but not the deceleration in the rise of how much we each consume by weight in rich countries – a slowdown that had already begun some time ago.

What this pandemic could do, if we so choose, is help us begin to see more clearly what was already there if only we had stopped and looked. For now, for a time, we have been forced to stop; we should use that experience wisely.

Related Topics

Tackling COVID-19

Income Inequality



Whether you agree, disagree or have another point of view, join the Forum Network for free using your email or social media accounts and tell us what's happening where you are. Your comments are what make the network the unique space it is, connecting citizens, experts and policy makers in open and respectful debate.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on The OECD Forum Network, please sign in

excellent article

leaving no one behind 

more actions SDGs3

Go to the profile of LEVY Claude
over 2 years ago

Every time the physical interactions between populations increase and develop, economical and health events are ahead, good or bad.                                                                            Let us think about the numerous pandemies resulting from the past expansion of territories by european countries resulting in the mix of previously separate ethnies and cultures. Observed during the medieval and industrial as well as present worldwide "mondialisation"period. Destruction of local cultures and ethnies, slavery, alcoolism, etc.      Why should we be surprised to experiment that good events and deeds are exchangeable  products as common as bad ones. The farmers are used to a relation with the nature which make good and bad crops usual. And they generally wisely try to manage anticipation and parades to improve their chances of survival.                                                                            Now at a humankind level we are in the same challenge, and the risks are the bad crops  well identified: atomic power uncontrolled, pandemies of germs issued from expandable and multiplied of new germs sources, (sida, covid, ebollah, etc), even physical changes in the earth ecocosm (CO2, pollution, overconsumption), as well as fascisms and violences and traffics of all kinds, and the list is not closed.                                                                      The problem is to know and act to keep, with a new international approach at the worldwide level, under control these problematics, and decide new rules able to preserve from a natural violent and painfull regulation with again millions of sevices, deaths, destructions, retrograde conditions, as we still every day see the desastrous human consequences .                                                                                                                Civilisations can disappear after their momentum, it is time to build a new civilisation to replace the 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 centuries one by a new deal more clever, open and convivial.    We have the potential tools and knowledges to operate this mutation.                                  A proposal first, why not, to fight again the main present risks, relied to the athmosphere and environment root in progress: every year, observe the same confinement not in the confinement behaviours but in the fact to stop almost all the interactions driving to over consumptionfor two months each year, applying the restriction rules to what is not relied to human essential needs.                                                                                                          The religions have well detected this useful practice which we name "diet". We need it and we must take advantage of it. In the opposite, aside a collective and organised massive move to manage a better drive of our obesity, we will experiment the "Pâques" Island syndrom, and the purge will be infinitely painful.